Sidonia von Borcke : diforc'h etre ar stummoù

Endalc’h diverket Danvez ouzhpennet
Diverradenn ebet eus ar c'hemm
Diverradenn ebet eus ar c'hemm
Linenn 7:
 
Ur vuhez "distabil" he doe, ha goude marv he c'hoar e 1600, e tremenas fin he buhez (adal 1604) en un ensavadur evit dimezelled luterian eus an noblañs, er pezh a oa bet Abati Marienfließ (Marianowo), hag a oa deuet da vezañ abaoe 1569, goude an Adkempenn Protestant, ur gouent evit maouezeddizimez a ouenn uhel. A-raok he devoa bet prosez ouzh he breur, Ulrich, ha Johan Friedrich, Dug Pomerania (1542-1600), ha betek lez-varn an impalaer e [[Vienna]].
E Marienfließ e savas bec'h etre Sidonia von Borcken hahag ar maouezed yaouankoc'h haa veve ganti, hag ivez gant ar mitizhien ha renerezed. Torret e oa bet eus he c'harg a "Unterpriorin" (ispriolez) gant ar [[priol|briolez]] Magdalena von Petersdorff en 1606, ma reas galv dirak [[Bogislaw XIII]], Dug Pomerania, a gasas ur bodad kuzulierien, renet gant Joachim von Wedel, da enklask er gouent.
Buan e savas bec'h etre ar bodad-se ha Sidonia von Borcken , ha von Wedel a gomzas gant renerez Marienfließ , Johannes von Hechthausen, da glask an tu da "gaout an dizober eus ar sarpantez binimus-se". Echuiñ a reas an tabut gant marv Bogislaw XIII en 1606, ha marvioù von Petersdorff, von Wedel ha von Hechthausen e 1609.
 
<!--
Two years later, Sidonia von Borcke filed complaints a-enep ar briolez nevez, Agnes von Kleist, to the new duke, Philip II. Like his predecessor, Philip installed a commission to investigate the claims, this time headed by Jost von Borcke, kar da Sidonia,[6] who already had been involved and humiliated in prior lawsuits concerning Sidonia.[7]
 
private and judicial conflicts with her mostly younger roommates as well as the administrative and technical staff.[5]
 
When she was dismissed from her post as a Unterpriorin (subprioress) by the convent's prioress Magdalena von Petersdorff in 1606, she appealed to Bogislaw XIII, Duke of Pomerania, who sent a commission headed by Joachim von Wedel to investigate the dispute.[5] The interaction between the commission and Sidonia von Borcken soon evolved into a major conflict, and von Wedel met in private with Marienfließ Hauptmann Johannes von Hechthausen to think about "getting rid of this poisonous snake". Echuiñ a reas an tabut gant marv Bogislaw XIII en 1606, ha marvioù von Petersdorff, von Wedel ha von Hechthausen e 1609. Two years later, Sidonia von Borcke filed complaints a-enep ar briolez nevez, Agnes von Kleist, to the new duke, Philip II. Like his predecessor, Philip installed a commission to investigate the claims, this time headed by Jost von Borcke, kar da Sidonia,[6] who already had been involved and humiliated in prior lawsuits concerning Sidonia.[7]
 
-->