Ekologiezh politikel : diforc'h etre ar stummoù

*an end to the [[War on Terrorism]] and the curtailment of [[civil rights]] - focusing instead on growing [[deliberative democracy]] in war-torn regions and the construction of a [[civil society]] with an increased role for women

*[[urban secession]] by major cities to permit them to shake off control of the suburbs and renew their economies in ways that they cannot do if they require the permission of their surrounding regions, e.g. to tax, ban cars in downtowns, or put money in [[mass transit]] instead of [[highway]]s

 

Because it lacks clear identification with powerful interest groups, and tends to appeal more to a world-view or [[mindset]], Green politics tends to grow slowly but also not to easily lose ground to other views or parties over time. In [[developed nation]]s Greens have typically stood at 3-12% of the vote for long periods of time without making breakthroughs, usually participating in government as a minority partner, or working at municipal or regional levels. Most Greens reject [[radical centrist politics]] though there is a strong overlap between that perspective and what is occasionally referred to as the "realist" wing of the Greens.

Green politics is usually said to include the [[green anarchism]], [[eco-anarchism]], [[anti-nuclear movement|anti-nuclear]] and [[peace movement]]s - although these often claim not to be aligned with any party. Some claim it also includes [[feminism]], [[pacifism]] and the [[animal rights]] movements. Most Greens support special policy measures to empower women, especially mothers; to oppose war and de-escalate conflicts and stop proliferating technologies useful in conflict or likely to lead to conflict, and such unusual measures as [[Great Ape personhood]].

 

 

*[http://www.global.greens.org.au/charter.htm Global Greens Charter, Canberra 2001]

*[http://cagreens.org/archives California Green Archives]