Stumm eus an 2 C'hwe 2009 da 19:57 kemmañ Neal (kaozeal \| degasadennoù) 36 397 kemm Diverradenn ebet eus ar c'hemm ← Kemm kent		Stumm eus an 2 C'hwe 2009 da 20:13 kemmañ dizober Neal (kaozeal \| degasadennoù) 36 397 kemm Diverradenn ebet eus ar c'hemm Kemm nevesoc'h →
Linenn 1: Er [[yezhoniezh]] e vez implijet an termen '''troadell''' evit komz eus ur frammadur yezhadurel implijet gantañ ur [[morfem distag]] (peurliesañ ur [[ger goullo]] pe ouzhpenn unan) kentoc'h evit ur [[morfologiezh\|benveg morfologel]] (d.l.e [[deveradur]] pe [[displegadur]]) evit displegañ ur [[rummad yezhadur]] pe ul [[kevreadurezh\|liamm yezhadurel]]. is a device by which a [[grammar\|grammatical]] category or relationship is expressed by a [[morfem distag]] (typically one or more [[Ger goullo]]s modifying a content word), instead of being shown by [[inflection]] or [[derivation (linguistics)\|derivation]]. For example, the [[English language\|English]] future tense is periphrastic: it is formed with an [[verb skoazell]] (''shall'' or ''will'') followed by the base form of the main verb. Linenn 7 ⟶ 5: Another example is the [[comparative]] and [[superlative]] forms of adjectives, when they are formed with the words ''more'' and ''most'' rather than with the [[suffix]]es ''-er'' and ''-est'': the forms ''more beautiful'' and ''most beautiful'' are periphrastic, while ''lovelier'' and ''loveliest'' are not.<ref>{{cite book\| title=A Student's Dictionary of Language and Linguistics\| last=Trask\| first=R. L.\| publisher=Arnold\| isbn=0-340-65266-7\| year=1997\| location=London\| page=166}}</ref> Periphrasis is a characteristic of [[yezh dezrannel\|yezhoù dezrannel]]s, which tend to avoid inflection. Even [[yezh sintezel\|yezhoù sintezel]]s, which are highly inflected, sometimes make use of periphrasis to fill out an inflectional paradigm that is missing certain forms.<ref>{{cite book\| last=Stump \|first=Gregory T. \|chapter=Inflection \|title=The Handbook of Morphology \|editor=Andrew Spencer and [[Arnold M. Zwicky]] (eds.) \|pages=13–43 \|year=1998 \|publisher=Blackwell \|location=Oxford \|isbn=0-631-18544-5}}</ref> A comparison of some [[Latin]] forms with their English translations shows that English uses periphrasis in many instances where Latin uses inflection:

Troadell (yezhoniezh) : diforc'h etre ar stummoù